Companies Can Risk Insolvency by Using Redundancy to Reduce Staff and Cut Costs

Copyright (c) 2010 Alison Withers

Companies struggling to survive a severe economic downturn like the current one often consider ways to reduce their overheads.

One of the biggest costs on a business is generally the payroll and it is a common response in a recession to look to redundancies as a way to reduce them.

Reasons for making employees redundant can be economic, techical or organisational. This can be that new technology or a new system has made a job unnecessary, the company needs to cut costs (as mentioned above) or that the business is closing down or moving.

However, making staff redundant is closely regulated and there are rules for the steps that a business must follow if it chooses to go down this route. These can be extremely expensive and if not managed properly could actually leave the company insolvent rather than achieving the desired objective.

In the first place, many companies bring in employment specialists to ensure they comply with the rules and carry out the process correctly and this alone can involve paying substantial fees.

If an employer is making fewer than 20 employees redundant in one establishment it must consult individually. For more than 20 employees being made redundant within a 90-day period it becomes a collective redundancy and this usually occurs when the company is either relocating or reorganizing its work activity.

For collective redundancy the employer has a duty to consult with representatives of the potentially affected employees. If the employer does not consult then the employees can apply to an Employment Tribunal claim for a protective award. This award is up to 90 days' pay.

The Government has laid down rules about employees' redundancy entitlements. The calculation is based on how long the employee has been continuously employed, their age and their weeks of entitlement up to a certain limit (£380 per week current allowance).

Failure to carry out a redundancy operation can also result in employees taking the employer to a Tribunal with a claim of unfair dismissal. In certain circumstances this can also add to the employer's costs, not only if the Tribunal rules in favour of the employee but also, in some specific circumstances Tribunals now have the power to award costs of up to £10,000. If a Tribunal finds in favour of the employee compensatory awards can be up to a maximum of £76,700.

According to the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development the direct financial cost to employers of redundancy per worker being made redundant in 2008/9 was estimated as ranging from £10,575 (where redundant workers are not subsequently replaced) to £15,242 (when redundant workers are to be replaced by new hires).

It is therefore possible that a struggling company may find that the process ends up simply adding to its financial problems in the short to medium term, especially because of the normal 90-day period of consultation.

So the wages and salaries still have to be paid for a further three months after the decision to make redundancies has been taken, and that is before any consultation fees and final payouts are included.

For a company facing difficult trading conditions and financial pressures it may be that there are other solutions then staff reduction to an expensive payroll that would put it in a better position once it starts to recover, not least because it may risk having key, experienced staff in place to help it take advantage of a recovery.

A better option for cost reduction before going down the redundancy route could be to call in a business rescue adviser to carry out a thorough review of the business to assess the business viability, look at its accounts and business model, identify any underlying weaknesses and suggest a restructuring plan.

The plan could include for example a short-term agreement between management and staff to cut hours or bonuses for a time to help the firm survive and rebuild. If more drastic measures are necessary the plan could involve a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) that may be necessary when the company cannot afford to pay redundancy costs. Such plans would need the advice of a restructuring specialist rather than an employment specialist.

Related Articles

• Be Aware Of The Fundamental Factors Of A Site Specific Safety Plan
• Japanese Akoya Pearl Necklace
• The Importance Of Writing A Business Plan
• How To Start A Referal Program
• Organizations Must Consider Paper Shredding Services

HTML Ready Article. Click on the "Copy" button to copy into your clipboard.

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN' 'http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd'><html><head><title>Articles Back Link | Companies Can Risk Insolvency by Using Redundancy to Reduce Staff and Cut Costs</title></head><body><h3>Companies Can Risk Insolvency by Using Redundancy to Reduce Staff and Cut Costs</h3><br><br> By: Alison Withers<br><br><p><p>Copyright (c) 2010 Alison Withers</P><p>Companies struggling to survive a severe economic downturn like the current one often consider ways to reduce their overheads.</P><p>One of the biggest costs on a business is generally the payroll and it is a common response in a recession to look to redundancies as a way to reduce them.</P><p>Reasons for making employees redundant can be economic, techical or organisational. This can be that new technology or a new system has made a job unnecessary, the company needs to cut costs (as mentioned above) or that the business is closing down or moving.</P><p>However, making staff redundant is closely regulated and there are rules for the steps that a business must follow if it chooses to go down this route. These can be extremely expensive and if not managed properly could actually leave the company insolvent rather than achieving the desired objective.</P><p>In the first place, many companies bring in employment specialists to ensure they comply with the rules and carry out the process correctly and this alone can involve paying substantial fees.</P><p>If an employer is making fewer than 20 employees redundant in one establishment it must consult individually. For more than 20 employees being made redundant within a 90-day period it becomes a collective redundancy and this usually occurs when the company is either relocating or reorganizing its work activity.</P><p>For collective redundancy the employer has a duty to consult with representatives of the potentially affected employees. If the employer does not consult then the employees can apply to an Employment Tribunal claim for a protective award. This award is up to 90 days' pay.</P><p>The Government has laid down rules about employees' redundancy entitlements. The calculation is based on how long the employee has been continuously employed, their age and their weeks of entitlement up to a certain limit (£380 per week current allowance).</P><p>Failure to carry out a redundancy operation can also result in employees taking the employer to a Tribunal with a claim of unfair dismissal. In certain circumstances this can also add to the employer's costs, not only if the Tribunal rules in favour of the employee but also, in some specific circumstances Tribunals now have the power to award costs of up to £10,000. If a Tribunal finds in favour of the employee compensatory awards can be up to a maximum of &pound76,700.</P><p>According to the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development the direct financial cost to employers of redundancy per worker being made redundant in 2008/9 was estimated as ranging from £10,575 (where redundant workers are not subsequently replaced) to £15,242 (when redundant workers are to be replaced by new hires).</P><p>It is therefore possible that a struggling company may find that the process ends up simply adding to its financial problems in the short to medium term, especially because of the normal 90-day period of consultation.</P><p>So the wages and salaries still have to be paid for a further three months after the decision to make redundancies has been taken, and that is before any consultation fees and final payouts are included.</P><p>For a company facing difficult trading conditions and financial pressures it may be that there are other solutions then staff reduction to an expensive payroll that would put it in a better position once it starts to recover, not least because it may risk having key, experienced staff in place to help it take advantage of a recovery.</P><p>A better option for cost reduction before going down the redundancy route could be to call in a business rescue adviser to carry out a thorough review of the business to assess the business viability, look at its accounts and business model, identify any underlying weaknesses and suggest a restructuring plan.</P><p>The plan could include for example a short-term agreement between management and staff to cut hours or bonuses for a time to help the firm survive and rebuild. If more drastic measures are necessary the plan could involve a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) that may be necessary when the company cannot afford to pay redundancy costs. Such plans would need the advice of a restructuring specialist rather than an employment specialist.<br></P></p> <br><br> <b>Author Resource:-></b>  <br><br><b>Article From</b> <a href='http://www.articlesbacklink.com/'>Articles Back Link</a><br></body></html>